Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 06/25/2014 11:36 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > >>>- I completely loathe the file layout you've proposed in > >>>src/include/storage. If we're going to have separate #include files > >>>for each architecture (and I'd rather we didn't go that route, because > >>>it's messy and unlike what we have now), then shouldn't that stuff go > >>>in src/include/port or a new directory src/include/port/atomics? > >>>Polluting src/include/storage with a whole bunch of files called > >>>atomics-whatever.h strikes me as completely ugly, and there's a lot of > >>>duplicate code in there. > >I don't mind moving it somewhere else and it's easy enough to change. > > I think having a separate file for each architecture is nice. I > totally agree that they don't belong in src/include/storage, though. > s_lock.h has always been misplaced there, but we've let it be for > historical reasons, but now that we're adding a dozen new files, > it's time to move them out.
We also have a bunch of files in src/backend/storage/lmgr, both current and introduced by this patch, which would be good to relocate. (Really, how did lmgr/ end up in storage/ in the first place?) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
