On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > =?UTF-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn=20Sloth=20T=C3=B8nnesen?= <asbj...@asbjorn.it> writes: >> Please see the following patches for implementing support >> for and migrating to Tau in PostgreSQL. > > While I don't particularly object to adding a tau() function, the rest of > this seems like change for the sake of change. What's the point? And > it had better be a darn good point, because cross-version code differences > are a constant source of maintenance pain for us. We don't need ones > that have no concrete value.
Perhaps we should also have a pau() function, as proposed here: http://xkcd.com/1292/ On a related note, I think we should declare "vi" the officially favored editor of the PostgreSQL project. (Note: No, I'm not serious.) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
