On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Mmm. This patch is found that useless, from the first.
>
>> Thanks for the patch! But when I read the source code of pg_resetxlog,
>> I found that it has already reset the backup locations. Please see
>> RewriteControlFile() which does that. So I wonder if we need nothing
>> at least in HEAD for the purpose which you'd like to achieve. Thought?
>
> Thank you for noticing of that, I checked by myself and found
> that what this patch intended is already done in all
> origin/REL9_x_STABLE. What is more, that code has not changed for
> over hundreds of commits on each branch, that is, maybe from the
> first. I don't know how I caught in such a stupid
> misunderstanding, but all these patches are totally useless.

So we should mark this patch as "Rejected Patches"?

> Sorry for taking your time for such a useless thing and thank you
> for your kindness.

No problem!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to