Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I don't think it's fair to mark this as returned with feedback without a > more detailed review (I think of returned with feedback as providing a > concrete direction to follow). I've set it back to "needs review".
> Does anyone else want to look at this patch? I offered a few comments. I think it might also be useful to try to quantify the worst-case performance cost for this, which would arise for a single-table query on a table with lots of indexes. Don't have time for that myself though. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers