Christoph Berg <[email protected]> writes:
> Re: Tom Lane 2014-07-01 <[email protected]>
>> Fair enough. I went for a minimum-change approach when hacking that
>> script, but we could change it some more in the name of readability.
>> Will do something about that.
> Thanks, it's much nicer now. There's one uglyness left though: The
> name PG_CHILD_OOM_SCORE_ADJ should match what actually gets passed to
> the backends,
Meh ... I don't find that to be important. Making a parallel with
PG_MASTER_OOM_SCORE_ADJ seemed more helpful here.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
