Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> writes: > Re: Tom Lane 2014-07-01 <20654.1404247...@sss.pgh.pa.us> >> Fair enough. I went for a minimum-change approach when hacking that >> script, but we could change it some more in the name of readability. >> Will do something about that.
> Thanks, it's much nicer now. There's one uglyness left though: The > name PG_CHILD_OOM_SCORE_ADJ should match what actually gets passed to > the backends, Meh ... I don't find that to be important. Making a parallel with PG_MASTER_OOM_SCORE_ADJ seemed more helpful here. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers