Andrew Gierth <[email protected]> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom> If we're going to do that, I think it needs to be in 9.4. Are
> Tom> you going to work up a patch?
> Do we want a decision on the fn_extra matter first, or shall I do one
> patch for the econtext, and a following one for fn_extra?
I think they're somewhat independent, and probably best patched
separately. In any case orderedsetagg.c's use of fn_extra is a local
matter that we'd not really have to fix in 9.4, except to the extent
that you think third-party code might copy it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
