Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: > "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Tom> If we're going to do that, I think it needs to be in 9.4. Are > Tom> you going to work up a patch?
> Do we want a decision on the fn_extra matter first, or shall I do one > patch for the econtext, and a following one for fn_extra? I think they're somewhat independent, and probably best patched separately. In any case orderedsetagg.c's use of fn_extra is a local matter that we'd not really have to fix in 9.4, except to the extent that you think third-party code might copy it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers