On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Well, to be fair, the original patch was posted to the list more than a > month ago, and it should have been in this CF. But… it wasn't. And now > after more than two weeks into this CF, I don't think it should be.
Is that how the rule is interpreted? Okay, I defer to you. I guess I've just never seen a situation where that distinction needed to be drawn come up before. > I moved it to 2014-08. (Sorry, Peter.) I don't mind if no one looks at this until then. I agree that this is exactly the kind of thing that generally doesn't need to be handled through a commitfest submission. The only reason I added this to any commitfest was to avoid having it be forgotten about entirely, which there is a real danger of for something like this when it isn't handled quickly. I almost forgot about it myself. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
