Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> TBH, I thought that RETURNING PRIMARY KEY was already fairly iffy
>> in that the application would have little idea what it was getting back.
>> IF EXISTS would make it so spongy as to be useless, IMO.
> Seems easy enough to look at the count of columns in the result set.
Sure, if you know how many columns are in the table to begin with; but
that goes back to having table metadata. If you don't, you're probably
going to be issuing "RETURNING *", and AFAICS "RETURNING *, PRIMARY KEY"
would be entirely useless (even without IF EXISTS :-().
I'm still unconvinced that there's a robust use-case here.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
