Adam, * Brightwell, Adam (adam.brightw...@crunchydatasolutions.com) wrote: > > Yeah, now that we're trying to bake this into ALTER TABLE we need to be > > a bit more cautious. I'd think: > > > > ALTER TABLE tab POLICY ADD ... > > > > Would work though? (note: haven't looked/tested myself) > > Yes, I just tested it and the following would work from a grammar > perspective: > > ALTER TABLE <table_name> POLICY ADD <policy_name> (policy_quals) > ALTER TABLE <table_name> POLICY DROP <policy_name>
Excellent, glad to hear it.
> Though, it would obviously require the addition of POLICY to the list of
> unreserved keywords. I don't suspect that would be a concern, as it is not
> "reserved", but thought I would point it out just in case.
Right, I don't anticipate anyone complaining too loudly about that..
> Another thought I had was, would we also want the following, so that
> policies could be modified?
>
> ALTER TABLE <table_name> POLICY ALTER <policy_name> (policy_quals)
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
