Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> I haven't followed this at all, but I just skimmed over it and noticed
> the CustomPlanMarkPos thingy; apologies if this has been discussed
> before. It seems a bit odd to me; why isn't it sufficient to have a
> boolean flag in regular CustomPlan to indicate that it supports
> mark/restore?
Yeah, I thought that was pretty bogus too, but it's well down the
list of issues that were there last time I looked at this ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
