On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> 9.4 beta docs are listed as "Current as of 2014-05-10". >> I'm assuming that's just a step we missed in the version stamping? > > No, what that means is that nobody has looked at the commit logs since > then to see if the 9.4 release notes need any updates. Since we don't > release-note simple bug fixes in a branch before the .0 release, > 9.4 isn't yet getting the same notes as the back branches; it requires > a scan of the commit logs with different criteria, ie look for feature > changes. And I didn't do that over the weekend (I barely got the > back-branch notes done :-().
Ah. I just did a "git log" on it and saw there were a number of updates in the relnotes themselves, didn't reflect on the fact that nobody had checked them against *other* updates to the tree. > It will get done at least once before 9.4.0, but I suspect that any > changes as a result of that will be pretty minor, so I'm not terribly > upset that it didn't happen for beta2. Nope, I agree. I just thought it meant something else... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers