On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Okay. As mentioned upthread, I have fixed by ensuring that for duplicate > > config params, retain only which comes later during parsing. > > I think it might have been bit simpler to fix, if we try to fix after > > parsing > > is complete, but I think for that we might need to replicate the logic > > at multiple places. > > ISTM that the patch works fine. Only concern is that the logic needs > O(n^2) comparison, which may cause performance problem. But > "n" in O(n^2) is the number of uncommented parameters and I don't > think it's so big, ISTM I can live with the logic...
Thanks for reviewing the patch. I also think that having O(n^2) comparisons should not be a problem in this logic as it will be processed only during load/parse of config file which we don't do in performance sensitive path. With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com