On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: >> >> No. If we change it to PGC_SIGHUP, SHOW command does display >> the changed value after a reload. It's the same behavior as other >> PGC_SIGHUP parameters do. Attached patch just changes it to PGC_SIGHUP. >> You can test that by using the patch. > > As this patch is marked as Needs Review, so I went ahead and > picked up for review, however after reading mail chain, it seems to > me that there is a general inclination to have a new category in > GucContext for this feature. I don't see the patch implementing the > same in this thread, so I think it is better to move it to next CF > (2014-08).
Yep, agreed. I just moved this to next CF. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
