Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 25 July 2014 20:47, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Another idea would be to
> ...persist the optimal dump order in the database. > That way we can maintain the correct dump order each time we do DDL, > which is only a small incremental cost, no matter how many objects we > have. I don't see any obvious way to make it incremental; so I doubt that it would be a small extra cost. In any case I disagree that making DDL slower to make pg_dump faster is a good tradeoff. Many people seldom or never use pg_dump. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers