On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > We've got a clear example of someone, quite reasonably, expecting their > JSONB object to be compressed using the normal TOAST mechanism, and > we're failing to do that in cases where it's actually a win to do so. > That's the focus of this discussion and what needs to be addressed > before 9.4 goes out.
Sure. I'm not trying to minimize that. We should fix it, certainly. However, it does bear considering that JSON data, with each document stored in a row is not an effective target for TOAST compression in general, even as text. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
