On 2014-08-20 00:58:22 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > I don't much like adding a separate function for every SSL implementation, > but you've got a point that it would be nice to make it difficult to call > PQgetSSLstruct() and just assume that the returned struct is e.g an OpenSSL > struct, while it's actually something else. Perhaps:
A good reason to not have functions with the respective functions is that it requires either including the relevant headers or adding forward declarations of the libraries type. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
