On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J] <kbak...@its.jnj.com> wrote: > My proof of concept code (steps a though e below) avoided any reading or > writing to the pipe (and associated handling of SIGPIPE), it just relied on > postmaster open of PIPE with ENXIO to indicate all is clear.
I'm not following. > Robert, Assuming an algorithm choice is agreed upon in the near future, would > you be the logical choice to implement the change? > I am happy to help, especially with any QNX-specific aspects, but don't want > to step on anyone's toes. I'm unlikely to have time to work on this in the immediate future, but I may be able to help review. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
