On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> this might be difficult to call this as --concurrently. >> It might need to be change the name. > > I'm OK to say that as --concurrently if the document clearly > explains that restriction. Or --almost-concurrently? ;P By reading that I am thinking as well about a wording with "lock", like --minimum-locks. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
