At 1:30 AM -0500 11/1/02, Tom Lane wrote: >I said: >> Peter Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Perhaps the change from gcc2.x to 3.x changed floats a bit? > >> Could be. We had previous reports of the same diff on OSX 10.2 with >> a G4 processor, so I was wondering if it was hardware or software >> differences (geometry-powerpc-darwin.out matches exactly on my G3 >> laptop running OSX 10.1). I have a 10.2 CD and am planning to update >> sometime soon to verify this by experiment. > >I have done the update and now I get the "...40473" output on the same >hardware that useta pass. So it's clearly a software-version issue. > >Is it worth carrying two expected files for OS X 10.1 and 10.2? I'm >inclined to think not, and am leaning towards updating the expected >file. Comments?
I'm 90% certain that the difference is caused by GCC 2.95 vs 3.1. (10.0 & 10.1 vs 10.2) If you can easily pick the right file based which GCC compiled it, that'd be ideal. -pmb ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
