On 09/01/2014 10:41 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote: > This is exactly why we need a new language. > All the clumsy stuff we cannot fix in plpgsql, can easily be fixed in > plpgsql2, with the most beautiful syntax we can come up with. > > I guess it's a question if we want to support things like this. If we > want to, then we also want a new language.
Given how much bike shedding occurs around trivial features, can you imagine how long that'd take? -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
