On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > On 09/02/2014 04:32 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote: >> I think it's much better to make it the default behaviour in plpgsql2 >> than to add a new syntax to plpgsql, >> because then we don't have to argue what to call the keyword or where to >> put it. > > > Then you'll have to argue what the *other* syntax should look like. And not > everyone agrees on the default either, see Kevin's email. Designing a new > language is going to be an uphill battle, even more so than enhancing > current plpgsql.
Any ideas on what the *other* syntax could look like? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
