Hi
2014-09-03 13:18 GMT+02:00 Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com>: > We now have 32 patches in "Needs Review" state, and 7 of those don't have > a reviewer assigned. They are: > > 1. Grouping Sets I plan to do review of Grouping Sets, but I am afraid so I cannot to do in next two weeks. Regards Pavel > 2. hash join - dynamic bucket count > 3. Enable WAL archiving even in standby > 4. Selectivity estimation for inet operators > 5. Better syntax for REINDEX > 6. pgcrypto: support PGP signatures > 7. pgcrypto: PGP armour headers > > Out of these, the first 4 have generated a fair amount of discussion on > the list, but no-one has dared to put down their name as a reviewer. What > is the real status of these patches, are the authors really waiting for a > review at this stage? Authors: please speak up and update the status to > "Returned with Feedback" or "Waiting on Author", if you know how to > proceed. Others: If you have been involved in the discussions, please sign > up as a reviewer and make a decision on how to move forward with the patch. > > I think the latter 3 patches are missing a reviewer because no-one is > interested in them. There was some discussion on the REINDEX syntax, and > whether we want the patch at all. The pgcrypto patches have received zero > comments. > > If you think that a feature is worthwhile, please sign up as a reviewer. > If these patches don't have a reviewer assigned by the end of the week, I'm > going to mark them as Rejected on the grounds that no-one cares about them. > > - Heikki > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
