Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Tom, are you planning to take this one?
Yeah, I already looked at it once, so will take it. I think the main remaining issue is that we don't have consensus on the function name AFAICT. I'm okay with using width_bucket(), as is done in the latest patch, but there were objections ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers