On 10.9.2014 21:34, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Tomas Vondra <t...@fuzzy.cz> wrote:
>> On 10.9.2014 20:25, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2014 01:49 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>>> I also did a few 'minor' changes to the dense allocation patch, most
>>>> notably:
>>>>
>>>> * renamed HashChunk/HashChunkData to MemoryChunk/MemoryChunkData
>>>>    The original naming seemed a bit awkward.
>>>
>>> That's too easy to confuse with regular MemoryContext and AllocChunk
>>> stuff. I renamed it to HashMemoryChunk.
>>
>> BTW this breaks the second patch, which is allocating new chunks when
>> resizing the hash table. Should I rebase the patch, or can the commiter
>> do s/MemoryChunk/HashMemoryChunk/ ?
>>
>> Assuming there are no more fixes needed, of course.
> 
> Rebasing it will save the committer time, which will increase the
> chances that one will look at your patch.  So it's highly recommended.

OK. So here's v13 of the patch, reflecting this change.

regards
Tomas
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/explain.c b/src/backend/commands/explain.c
index 781a736..d128e08 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/explain.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/explain.c
@@ -1900,18 +1900,21 @@ show_hash_info(HashState *hashstate, ExplainState *es)
 		if (es->format != EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT)
 		{
 			ExplainPropertyLong("Hash Buckets", hashtable->nbuckets, es);
+			ExplainPropertyLong("Original Hash Buckets",
+								hashtable->nbuckets_original, es);
 			ExplainPropertyLong("Hash Batches", hashtable->nbatch, es);
 			ExplainPropertyLong("Original Hash Batches",
 								hashtable->nbatch_original, es);
 			ExplainPropertyLong("Peak Memory Usage", spacePeakKb, es);
 		}
-		else if (hashtable->nbatch_original != hashtable->nbatch)
+		else if ((hashtable->nbatch_original != hashtable->nbatch) ||
+				 (hashtable->nbuckets_original != hashtable->nbuckets))
 		{
 			appendStringInfoSpaces(es->str, es->indent * 2);
 			appendStringInfo(es->str,
-			"Buckets: %d  Batches: %d (originally %d)  Memory Usage: %ldkB\n",
-							 hashtable->nbuckets, hashtable->nbatch,
-							 hashtable->nbatch_original, spacePeakKb);
+			"Buckets: %d (originally %d)  Batches: %d (originally %d)  Memory Usage: %ldkB\n",
+							 hashtable->nbuckets, hashtable->nbuckets_original,
+							 hashtable->nbatch, hashtable->nbatch_original, spacePeakKb);
 		}
 		else
 		{
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeHash.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeHash.c
index 3ef7cfb..4f00426 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeHash.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeHash.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 
 
 static void ExecHashIncreaseNumBatches(HashJoinTable hashtable);
+static void ExecHashIncreaseNumBuckets(HashJoinTable hashtable);
 static void ExecHashBuildSkewHash(HashJoinTable hashtable, Hash *node,
 					  int mcvsToUse);
 static void ExecHashSkewTableInsert(HashJoinTable hashtable,
@@ -49,6 +50,9 @@ static void ExecHashRemoveNextSkewBucket(HashJoinTable hashtable);
 
 static void *dense_alloc(HashJoinTable hashtable, Size size);
 
+/* Memory needed for optimal number of buckets. */
+#define BUCKETS_SPACE(htab)	((htab)->nbuckets_optimal * sizeof(HashJoinTuple))
+
 /* ----------------------------------------------------------------
  *		ExecHash
  *
@@ -117,6 +121,7 @@ MultiExecHash(HashState *node)
 				/* It's a skew tuple, so put it into that hash table */
 				ExecHashSkewTableInsert(hashtable, slot, hashvalue,
 										bucketNumber);
+				hashtable->skewTuples += 1;
 			}
 			else
 			{
@@ -127,6 +132,25 @@ MultiExecHash(HashState *node)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* resize the hash table if needed (NTUP_PER_BUCKET exceeded) */
+	if (hashtable->nbuckets != hashtable->nbuckets_optimal)
+	{
+		/* We never decrease the number of buckets. */
+		Assert(hashtable->nbuckets_optimal > hashtable->nbuckets);
+
+#ifdef HJDEBUG
+		printf("Increasing nbuckets %d => %d\n",
+			   hashtable->nbuckets, hashtable->nbuckets_optimal);
+#endif
+
+		ExecHashIncreaseNumBuckets(hashtable);
+	}
+
+	/* Account for the buckets in spaceUsed (reported in EXPLAIN ANALYZE) */
+	hashtable->spaceUsed += BUCKETS_SPACE(hashtable);
+	if (hashtable->spaceUsed > hashtable->spacePeak)
+			hashtable->spacePeak = hashtable->spaceUsed;
+
 	/* must provide our own instrumentation support */
 	if (node->ps.instrument)
 		InstrStopNode(node->ps.instrument, hashtable->totalTuples);
@@ -272,7 +296,10 @@ ExecHashTableCreate(Hash *node, List *hashOperators, bool keepNulls)
 	 */
 	hashtable = (HashJoinTable) palloc(sizeof(HashJoinTableData));
 	hashtable->nbuckets = nbuckets;
+	hashtable->nbuckets_original = nbuckets;
+	hashtable->nbuckets_optimal = nbuckets;
 	hashtable->log2_nbuckets = log2_nbuckets;
+	hashtable->log2_nbuckets_optimal = log2_nbuckets;
 	hashtable->buckets = NULL;
 	hashtable->keepNulls = keepNulls;
 	hashtable->skewEnabled = false;
@@ -286,6 +313,7 @@ ExecHashTableCreate(Hash *node, List *hashOperators, bool keepNulls)
 	hashtable->nbatch_outstart = nbatch;
 	hashtable->growEnabled = true;
 	hashtable->totalTuples = 0;
+	hashtable->skewTuples = 0;
 	hashtable->innerBatchFile = NULL;
 	hashtable->outerBatchFile = NULL;
 	hashtable->spaceUsed = 0;
@@ -386,7 +414,7 @@ ExecHashTableCreate(Hash *node, List *hashOperators, bool keepNulls)
  */
 
 /* Target bucket loading (tuples per bucket) */
-#define NTUP_PER_BUCKET			10
+#define NTUP_PER_BUCKET			1
 
 void
 ExecChooseHashTableSize(double ntuples, int tupwidth, bool useskew,
@@ -396,6 +424,7 @@ ExecChooseHashTableSize(double ntuples, int tupwidth, bool useskew,
 {
 	int			tupsize;
 	double		inner_rel_bytes;
+	long		buckets_bytes;
 	long		hash_table_bytes;
 	long		skew_table_bytes;
 	long		max_pointers;
@@ -418,6 +447,16 @@ ExecChooseHashTableSize(double ntuples, int tupwidth, bool useskew,
 	inner_rel_bytes = ntuples * tupsize;
 
 	/*
+	 * Compute memory occupied by buckets, assuming all tuples fit into
+	 * a single batch (consider NTUP_PER_BUCKET tuples per bucket) - buckets
+	 * are just 'HashJoinTuple' elements (pointers to HashJoinTupleData).
+	 * Also, we never use less than 1024 buckets.
+	 */
+	nbuckets = (1 << my_log2(ntuples / NTUP_PER_BUCKET));
+	nbuckets = Max(1024, nbuckets);
+	buckets_bytes = sizeof(HashJoinTuple) * nbuckets;
+
+	/*
 	 * Target in-memory hashtable size is work_mem kilobytes.
 	 */
 	hash_table_bytes = work_mem * 1024L;
@@ -468,16 +507,13 @@ ExecChooseHashTableSize(double ntuples, int tupwidth, bool useskew,
 	/* also ensure we avoid integer overflow in nbatch and nbuckets */
 	max_pointers = Min(max_pointers, INT_MAX / 2);
 
-	if (inner_rel_bytes > hash_table_bytes)
+	if ((inner_rel_bytes + buckets_bytes) > hash_table_bytes)
 	{
 		/* We'll need multiple batches */
 		long		lbuckets;
 		double		dbatch;
 		int			minbatch;
-
-		lbuckets = (hash_table_bytes / tupsize) / NTUP_PER_BUCKET;
-		lbuckets = Min(lbuckets, max_pointers);
-		nbuckets = (int) lbuckets;
+		long		bucket_size;
 
 		dbatch = ceil(inner_rel_bytes / hash_table_bytes);
 		dbatch = Min(dbatch, max_pointers);
@@ -485,6 +521,54 @@ ExecChooseHashTableSize(double ntuples, int tupwidth, bool useskew,
 		nbatch = 2;
 		while (nbatch < minbatch)
 			nbatch <<= 1;
+
+		/* memory needed by a single "full" bucket (including tuples) */
+		bucket_size = (tupsize * NTUP_PER_BUCKET + sizeof(HashJoinTuple));
+
+		/*
+		 * When batching, we use buckets size for full work_mem. We simply
+		 * divide work_mem by memory needed per 'full bucket' (a pointer and
+		 * NTUP_PER_BUCKET tuples, each 'tupsize' bytes, including additional
+		 * overhead for hash, pointer to the next tuple etc.).
+		 */
+		lbuckets = 1 << my_log2(hash_table_bytes / bucket_size);
+
+		/* protect against nbucket overflow */
+		lbuckets = Min(lbuckets, max_pointers);
+		nbuckets = (int) lbuckets;
+
+		/* Compute memory needed for buckets. */
+		buckets_bytes = nbuckets * sizeof(HashJoinTuple);
+
+		/*
+		 * Buckets are simple pointers to hashjoin tuples, while tupsize is
+		 * always >= 24B, plus actual data. So buckets should never really
+		 * exceed 25% of work_mem (even for NTUP_PER_BUCKET=1). Except maybe
+		 * for work_mem values that are not 2^N bytes, where we might get more
+		 * because of doubling. So let's look for 50% here.
+		 */
+		Assert(buckets_bytes <= hash_table_bytes/2);
+
+		/*
+		 * Subtract the buckets from work_mem, so we know how much memory
+		 * remains for the actual tuples.
+		 */
+		hash_table_bytes -= buckets_bytes;
+
+		/*
+		 * Increase the nbatch until we get both tuples and buckets into work_mem.
+		 *
+		 * The loop should not execute more than once in most cases, becase tuples are
+		 * usually much wider than buckets (usually 8B pointers), so by using only
+		 * (batch_bytes/2) should get us below work_mem.
+		 *
+		 * The worst case is that (nbuckets == 2*ntuples-1), giving us about twice the
+		 * number of buckets, i.e. about 2*sizeof(void*) per tuple. But that's
+		 * the consequence of how NTUP_PER_BUCKET is chosen, and work_mem limit.
+		 */
+		while ((inner_rel_bytes / nbatch) > hash_table_bytes)
+			nbatch <<= 1;
+
 	}
 	else
 	{
@@ -614,6 +698,19 @@ ExecHashIncreaseNumBatches(HashJoinTable hashtable)
 	 */
 	ninmemory = nfreed = 0;
 
+	/* If know we need to resize nbuckets, we can do it while rebatching. */
+	if (hashtable->nbuckets_optimal != hashtable->nbuckets)
+	{
+		/* we never decrease the number of buckets */
+		Assert(hashtable->nbuckets_optimal > hashtable->nbuckets);
+
+		hashtable->nbuckets = hashtable->nbuckets_optimal;
+		hashtable->log2_nbuckets = hashtable->log2_nbuckets_optimal;
+
+		hashtable->buckets = repalloc(hashtable->buckets,
+									  sizeof(HashJoinTuple) * hashtable->nbuckets);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We will scan through the chunks directly, so that we can reset the
 	 * buckets now and not have to keep track which tuples in the buckets have
@@ -698,6 +795,93 @@ ExecHashIncreaseNumBatches(HashJoinTable hashtable)
 }
 
 /*
+ * ExecHashIncreaseNumBuckets
+ *		increase the original number of buckets in order to reduce
+ *		number of tuples per bucket
+ */
+static void
+ExecHashIncreaseNumBuckets(HashJoinTable hashtable)
+{
+	HashMemoryChunk	chunk;
+
+	/* do nothing if not an increase (it's called increase for a reason) */
+	if (hashtable->nbuckets >= hashtable->nbuckets_optimal)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * We already know the optimal number of buckets, so let's just
+	 * compute the log2_nbuckets for it.
+	 */
+	hashtable->nbuckets = hashtable->nbuckets_optimal;
+	hashtable->log2_nbuckets = my_log2(hashtable->nbuckets_optimal);
+
+	Assert(hashtable->nbuckets > 1);
+	Assert(hashtable->nbuckets <= (INT_MAX/2));
+	Assert(hashtable->nbuckets == (1 << hashtable->log2_nbuckets));
+
+#ifdef HJDEBUG
+	printf("Increasing nbuckets to %d\n", hashtable->nbuckets);
+#endif
+
+	/*
+	 * Just reallocate the proper number of buckets - we don't need to
+	 * walk through them - we can walk the dense-allocated chunks
+	 * (just like in ExecHashIncreaseNumBatches, but without all the
+	 * copying into new chunks)
+	 */
+
+	hashtable->buckets = (HashJoinTuple *) repalloc(hashtable->buckets,
+								hashtable->nbuckets * sizeof(HashJoinTuple));
+
+	memset(hashtable->buckets, 0, sizeof(void*) * hashtable->nbuckets);
+
+	/* scan through all tuples in all chunks, rebuild the hash table */
+	chunk = hashtable->chunks;
+	while (chunk != NULL)
+	{
+
+		/* position within the buffer (up to chunk->used) */
+		size_t idx = 0;
+
+		/* process all tuples stored in this chunk (and then free it) */
+		while (idx < chunk->used)
+		{
+
+			/* get the hashjoin tuple and mintuple stored right after it */
+			HashJoinTuple hashTuple = (HashJoinTuple)(chunk->data + idx);
+			MinimalTuple tuple = HJTUPLE_MINTUPLE(hashTuple);
+
+			int		hashTupleSize = (HJTUPLE_OVERHEAD + tuple->t_len);
+
+			int		bucketno;
+			int		batchno;
+
+			ExecHashGetBucketAndBatch(hashtable, hashTuple->hashvalue,
+									  &bucketno, &batchno);
+
+			/* just add the tuple to the proper bucket */
+			hashTuple->next = hashtable->buckets[bucketno];
+			hashtable->buckets[bucketno] = hashTuple;
+
+			/* bytes occupied in memory HJ tuple overhead + actual tuple length */
+			idx += MAXALIGN(hashTupleSize);
+
+		}
+
+		/* proceed to the next chunk */
+		chunk = chunk->next;
+
+	}
+
+#ifdef HJDEBUG
+	printf("Nbuckets increased to %d, average items per bucket %.1f\n",
+		   hashtable->nbuckets, batchTuples / hashtable->nbuckets);
+#endif
+
+}
+
+
+/*
  * ExecHashTableInsert
  *		insert a tuple into the hash table depending on the hash value
  *		it may just go to a temp file for later batches
@@ -730,6 +914,7 @@ ExecHashTableInsert(HashJoinTable hashtable,
 		 */
 		HashJoinTuple hashTuple;
 		int			hashTupleSize;
+		double		ntuples = (hashtable->totalTuples - hashtable->skewTuples);
 
 		/* Create the HashJoinTuple */
 		hashTupleSize = HJTUPLE_OVERHEAD + tuple->t_len;
@@ -750,12 +935,30 @@ ExecHashTableInsert(HashJoinTable hashtable,
 		hashTuple->next = hashtable->buckets[bucketno];
 		hashtable->buckets[bucketno] = hashTuple;
 
+		/*
+		 * Increase the (optimal) number of buckets if we just exceeded NTUP_PER_BUCKET,
+		 * but only when there's still a single batch at this moment.
+		 */
+		if ((hashtable->nbatch == 1) &&
+			(hashtable->nbuckets_optimal <= INT_MAX/2) &&	/* overflow protection */
+			(ntuples >= (hashtable->nbuckets_optimal * NTUP_PER_BUCKET)))
+		{
+			hashtable->nbuckets_optimal *= 2;
+			hashtable->log2_nbuckets_optimal += 1;
+		}
+
 		/* Account for space used, and back off if we've used too much */
 		hashtable->spaceUsed += hashTupleSize;
 		if (hashtable->spaceUsed > hashtable->spacePeak)
 			hashtable->spacePeak = hashtable->spaceUsed;
-		if (hashtable->spaceUsed > hashtable->spaceAllowed)
+
+		/*
+		 * Do we need to increase number of batches? Account for space required
+		 * by buckets (optimal number).
+		 */
+		if (hashtable->spaceUsed + BUCKETS_SPACE(hashtable) > hashtable->spaceAllowed)
 			ExecHashIncreaseNumBatches(hashtable);
+
 	}
 	else
 	{
@@ -878,7 +1081,10 @@ ExecHashGetHashValue(HashJoinTable hashtable,
  * functions are good about randomizing all their output bits, else we are
  * likely to have very skewed bucket or batch occupancy.)
  *
- * nbuckets doesn't change over the course of the join.
+ * The nbuckets/log2_nbuckets may change while (nbatch==1) because of dynamic
+ * buckets growth. Once we start batching, the value is fixed and does not
+ * change over the course of join (making it possible to compute batch number
+ * the way we do here).
  *
  * nbatch is always a power of 2; we increase it only by doubling it.  This
  * effectively adds one more bit to the top of the batchno.
diff --git a/src/include/executor/hashjoin.h b/src/include/executor/hashjoin.h
index c9e61df..0e1e0cd 100644
--- a/src/include/executor/hashjoin.h
+++ b/src/include/executor/hashjoin.h
@@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ typedef struct HashJoinTableData
 	int			nbuckets;		/* # buckets in the in-memory hash table */
 	int			log2_nbuckets;	/* its log2 (nbuckets must be a power of 2) */
 
+	int			nbuckets_original;	/* # buckets when starting the first hash */
+	int			nbuckets_optimal;	/* optimal # buckets (per batch) */
+	int			log2_nbuckets_optimal;	/* same as log2_nbuckets optimal */
+
 	/* buckets[i] is head of list of tuples in i'th in-memory bucket */
 	struct HashJoinTupleData **buckets;
 	/* buckets array is per-batch storage, as are all the tuples */
@@ -148,6 +152,7 @@ typedef struct HashJoinTableData
 	bool		growEnabled;	/* flag to shut off nbatch increases */
 
 	double		totalTuples;	/* # tuples obtained from inner plan */
+	double		skewTuples;		/* # tuples inserted into skew tuples */
 
 	/*
 	 * These arrays are allocated for the life of the hash join, but only if
-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to