On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > A revert wasn't requested by the individual who raised the concern (or, > indeed, explicitly by *anyone*.. it was hinted at, but I felt the > individuals who were hinting at it were leaving it up to that individual > who had a concern), and I discussed it with him extensively and we came > to what I believe is an understanding. I'm not sure that I understand > the need to bring it up again, unless you have a concern regarding what > was committed.
FWIW, I think Heikki's proposal to revisit this in the next commitfest is fine. I don't think that this is something that needs to be pored over. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
