On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > >> - except that changes are returned as <type>bytea</type>. > >> + except that changes are returned as <type>bytea</type> and > that it > >> can > >> + be used on slots using output plugins that only support binary > >> output. > > > > Imo that's pretty much implied because it references the !binary > > version. But I guess it doesn't hurt to be explicit. How about: > > " ... on output plugins using any form of output, including binary."? > > I think you should just leave it alone. There's no problem with what > it says there right now. It goes without saying that if the plugin > can only return bytea, then you have to use the bytea-returning > function to get it. If it's not clear that such plugins might exist, > that needs to be clarified better elsewhere, not here. > Yes, not modifying the current text would be fine. -- Michael
