On 09/30/2014 04:16 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-09-30 16:03:01 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 09/30/2014 03:53 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> Good point. I think it's fair enough to only allow CINE on named >>> indexes. >> >> On the other hand, the way we form system-generated names is predicable, >> so I think it would be perfectly OK to include them. Desirable, in fact. > > It's not really that predicable. Think about expression indexes. They > also don't contain information about opclasses et all. > > Seems like pit of hairy semantics. > >> Not that I'm a fan of omitting the name ... > > Me neither.
I'd be OK with a CINE which required you to name the index. How does your patch work at present, Fabrizio? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
