On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-10-01 10:45:13 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > On 2014-09-29 14:46:20 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> This happened again, and I investigated further. >> > >> > Uh. Interestingly anole just succeeded twice: >> > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=anole&br=REL9_4_STABLE >> > >> > I plan to commit the mask/unmask patch regardless, but it's curious. The >> > first of the two builds could have been you 'unsticking' it by manually >> > mucking around. Did you also do that for the second build? >> >> No, but I think the failures have always been intermittent. > > There's no record of any relevantly failing builds on 9.4: > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=anole&br=REL9_4_STABLE > and none from master either: > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=anole&br=HEAD > > Is it setup for master now? Because it has reported back for 9.4 twice, > but never for master.
As far as I can tell, it's configured to run everything. I just checked, though, and found it wedged again. I'm not sure whether it was the same problem, though; I ended up just killing all of the postgres processes to fix it. We may be just at the beginning of an exciting debugging journey. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers