On 2014-10-02 10:40:30 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> OK. > > > > Given that the results look good, do you plan to push this? > > By "this", you mean the increase in the number of buffer mapping > partitions to 128, and a corresponding increase in MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS?
Yes. Now that I think about it I wonder if we shouldn't define MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS like #define MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS (NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS + 64) or something like that? > If so, and if you don't have any reservations, yeah I'll go change it. Yes, I'm happy with going forward. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
