Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-10-03 12:40:21 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Well, I think the issue is that having a GUC that can't reasonably be >> tuned by 95% of our users is nearly useless. Few users are going to run >> benchmarks to see what the optimal value is.
> It's possible to convince customers to play with a performance > influencing parameter and see how the results are. Even in > production. I'm a bit dubious that people will be willing to experiment in production with a GUC that requires a database restart to change. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers