On 2014-10-06 10:46:09 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > This seems messy, though. Can't the deferred trigger queue become > non-empty at pretty much any point in time? At exactly what point are > we making this decision, and how do we know the correct answer can't > change after that point?
What we've been talking about is doing this during executor startup. And at that point we really don't care about new entries in the queue during query execution - we can't see them anyway. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
