On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 21:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > If none of this gets us closer to an answer, I can try to produce a > > patch that produces more details for such failures. > > A test that fails for no reason that can be gleaned from the output is > not an improvement over not having a test at all.
I understand that this isn't great, and it's certainly something I'm looking into. But it's like pg_regress saying that psql crashed and leaving you to find out why. I don't think saying that the entire regression test suite is useless because of that is fair. The TAP tests are arguably already much easier to debug than pg_regress ever was. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
