On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > My point is that people are not really inclined to use an alias in > UPDATEs in general when referring to the target. The thing that seems > special (and worthy of special qualification) is the reference to what > you call the "incoming data", and what I've called "tuples proposed > for insertion" (after being affected by any before row triggers).
For simple cases, you might not even bother with CONFLICTING() - you might find it easier to just repeat the constant in the INSERT and UPDATE parts of the query. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
