Hmm.. Sorry for my stupidity. > Why is that necessary? It seems really rather wrong to make > BIO_set_retry_write() dependant on ProcDiePending? Especially as, at > least in my testing, it's not even required because the be_tls_write() > can just check the error properly?
I mistook the previous conversation as it doesn't work as expected. I confirmed that it works fine. After all, it works as I expected. The parameter for ProcessClientWriteInterrupt() looks somewhat uneasy but the patch 4 looks fine as a whole. Do you have anything to worry about in the patch? regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
