On 2014-10-11 17:19:27 -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:44:39AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Started a new thread to raise awareness. > > > Ref: this comes from > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cab7npqr1ivd5r_qn_ngmkbolqmagbosj4wnpo8eybnn6we_...@mail.gmail.com > > Thanks. You can assume I'm -1 on every header split proposal not driving a > substantial compile duration improvement:
I don't know. Isn't it, from a aesthetic POV, wrong to have all that stuff in builtins.h? The stuff split of really doesn't seem to belong there? I personally wouldn't object plaing a #include for the splitof file into builtin.h to address backward compat concerns. Would imo still be an improvement. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
