* Lucas Lersch (lucasler...@gmail.com) wrote: > I see this... but ReleaseBuffer() simply decrements the reference count of > page the buffer currently holds. Assuming that a ReadBuffer() - > ReleaseBuffer() pattern is used for interacting with the shared_buffers, > there will be a ReleaseBuffer() call for any page (heap or index) "loaded" > into the shared_buffers.
Not sure what you're getting at here. This was the original comment
that I was addressing:
-----------
Unfortunately, in the generated trace with over 2 million buffer requests,
only ~14k different pages are being accessed, out of the 800k of the whole
database. Am I missing something here?
-----------
So, there's 2MM buffer requests with only ~14k different pages even
though the database consists of ~800k different pages.
Either your short benchmark is only hitting ~14k different pages out of
the ~800k, or what you're actually looking at are the ~14k pages (eh,
more like 16k, but whatever) of the shared_buffer cache. Somewhere in
your analysis of the 2MM buffer requests you reduced the set of buffer
requests down to the set of "~14k different pages" that you're asking
about here.
What would be helpful here would be actual code changes you made (eg: a
patch), the resulting buffer request data (or at least a snippet of it),
and exactly how you did your analysis to come up with the ~14k number.
Thanks
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
