On 15 October 2014 17:03, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I'm fervently in agreement with you on one point: the first > version of all this needs to be as simple as possible, or the time to > get to the first version will be longer than we can afford to wait. I > think what we're discussing here is which things are important enough > that it makes sense to have them in the first version, and which > things can wait.
I'm guessing we might differ slightly on what constitutes as simple as possible. Something usable, with severe restrictions, is actually better than we have now. I understand the journey this work represents, so don't be embarrassed by submitting things with heuristics and good-enoughs in it. Our mentor, Mr.Lane, achieved much by spreading work over many releases, leaving others to join in the task. Might I gently enquire what the "something usable" we are going to see in this release? I'm not up on current plans. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
