On 17 October 2014 14:05, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Of course, this is a task that requires much more thinking, design, and > discussion than just adding multi-process capability to vacuumdb ... Yes, please proceed with this patch as originally envisaged. No more comments from me. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
