Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> There's rub here though. We unconditionally do:
>       /* Do post-vacuum cleanup and statistics update for each index */
>       for (i = 0; i < nindexes; i++)
>               lazy_cleanup_index(Irel[i], indstats[i], vacrelstats);

> and that's not particularly cheap. Maybe we should make that conditional
> when there's been no lazy_vacuum_index/heap calls at all?

Absolutely not.  If the cleanup step is skippable, it would be the
province of the index AM to make that decision.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to