rohtodeveloper wrote > So how to deal with this kind of situation if I want a implicit > conversion?
As of the out-of-support 8.3 release many of the implicit casts previously defined have been changed to explicit casts. It is a catalog change - obviously, since you can still define implicit casts - so if you absolutely must have the pre-existing cast be implicit you can modify the catalog directly. You may wish to describe why you think this is the solution you need - with implicit casting there are generally more downsides that upsides. Dave -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Would-you-help-to-review-our-modifications-tp5823666p5823679.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
