On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: >>> But TBH I suspect 95% of the problems here would vanish if smart >>> shutdown weren't the default ... > >> But for your repeated objections, we would have changed the default to fast >> years ago. AFAICT everyone else is in favor of that. > > I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't believe > I was the only one objecting.
What's your feeling now? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
