On 23 October 2014 15:39, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I'm going around in the circle. But I'd like to say again, I don't > think > this is good idea. It prevents asynchronous pg_receivexlog from fsyncing > WAL data and sending feedbacks more frequently at all. They are useful, > for example, when we want to monitor the write location of asynchronous > pg_receivexlog in almost realtime. But if we adopt the idea, since feedback > cannot be sent soon in async mode, pg_stat_replication always returns > the not-up-to-date location.
Why not send a message every 10 seconds when its not sync rep? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
