Hi

I did some performance tests and it is interesting:

it is about 15% faster than original implementation.

Regards

Pavel




2014-10-24 13:58 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>:

>
>
> 2014-10-24 11:43 GMT+02:00 Ali Akbar <the.ap...@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>> 2014-10-24 16:26 GMT+07:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> some in last patch is wrong, I cannot to compile it:
>>>
>>> arrayfuncs.c: In function ‘accumArrayResult’:
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4603:9: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named ‘alen’
>>>    astate->alen = 64;  /* arbitrary starting array size */
>>>          ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4604:9: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named
>>> ‘dvalues’
>>>    astate->dvalues = (Datum *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(Datum));
>>>          ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4604:44: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named ‘alen’
>>>    astate->dvalues = (Datum *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(Datum));
>>>                                             ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4605:9: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named
>>> ‘dnulls’
>>>    astate->dnulls = (bool *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(bool));
>>>          ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4605:42: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named ‘alen’
>>>    astate->dnulls = (bool *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(bool));
>>>                                           ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4606:9: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named
>>> ‘nelems’
>>>    astate->nelems = 0;
>>>          ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4618:13: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named
>>> ‘nelems’
>>>    if (astate->nelems >= astate->alen)
>>>              ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4618:31: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named ‘alen’
>>>    if (astate->nelems >= astate->alen)
>>>                                ^
>>> arrayfuncs.c:4620:10: error: ‘ArrayBuildState’ has no member named ‘alen’
>>>     astate->alen *= 2;
>>>
>>
>> Sorry,  correct patch attached.
>>
>> This patch is in patience format (git --patience ..). In previous
>> patches, i use context format (git --patience ... | filterdiff
>> --format=context), but it turns out that some modification is lost.
>>
>
> last version is compileable, but some is still broken
>
> postgres=# select array_agg(array[i, i+1, i-1])
>             from generate_series(1,2) a(i);
> ERROR:  could not find array type for data type integer[]
>
> but array(subselect) works
>
> postgres=# select array(select a from xx);
>        array
> -------------------
>  {{1,2,3},{1,2,3}}
> (1 row)
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Ali Akbar
>>
>
>

Reply via email to