* Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 2014-10-28 09:24:18 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > There is no doubt that consensus on the desirability and design needs > > to be reached before we can even consider committing it. I suspect > > Adam posted it simply because he had identified issues himself and > > wanted to make others aware that things had been fixed. > > > > That said, it sounds like the primary concern has been if we want this > > feature at all and there hasn't been much discussion of the design > > itself. > > Well, why waste time on the technical details when we haven't agreed > that the feature is worthwile? Review bandwidth is a serious problem in > this community.
Fair enough, and I'm happy to discuss that (and have been..); I was
simply objecting to the implication that the desirability concerns
raised were design concerns- the only design concern raised was wrt
it being possibly too heavyweight and the PGC_SUSET GUC suggestion (at
least, based on my re-reading of the thread..).
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
