On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Adam Brightwell <adam.brightw...@crunchydatasolutions.com> wrote: > Taking a step back, I'm still not sure I understand the need for this > feature or the use case. It seems to have started as a potential fix to an > inconsistency between ALTER USER and ALTER ROLE syntax (which I think I > could see some value in). However, I think it has been taken beyond just > resolving the inconsistency and started to cross over into feature creep. > Is the intent simply to resolve inconsistencies between what is now an alias > of another command? Or is it to add new functionality? I think the > original proposal needs to be revisited and more time needs to be spent > defining the scope and purpose of this patch.
+1. I've been reading this thread with some bemusement, but couldn't find a way articulate what you just said nearly as well as you just said it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
