On 28 October 2014 17:47, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-10-28 17:45:36 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I'd like to avoid all of the pain by making persistent AMs that are
>> recoverable after a crash, rather than during crash recovery.
>
> Besides the actual difficulities of supporting this, imo not being
> available on HS and directly after a failover essentially makes them
> next to useless.

Broken WAL implementations are worse than useless.

I'm saying we should work on how to fix broken indexes first, before
we allow a crop of new code that might cause them.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to