On 29/10/14 20:00, Robert Haas wrote:
After reviewing all of those possibilities with the sort of laser-like
focus the situation demands, I'm inclined to endorse Alvaro's proposal
to rename the existing dsm_keep_mapping() function to
dsm_pin_mapping() and the existing dsm_keep_segment() function to
dsm_pin_segment(). Then, I will add the new function as
dsm_unpin_mapping(). So:
1. Does anyone strongly object to that course of action?
Nah, it sounds reasonable.
2. Does anyone wish to argue for or against back-patching the name
changes to 9.4? My feeling is that we may as well, because either
nobody's using this yet, in which case back-patching it won't break
anything, or somebody is, in which case we'll cause less pain by
breaking it before release than a year on. But I don't care that much
either way, so I'll defer if others disagree.
+1
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
