Hi, On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Eric Ridge <eeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> I don't know if/when that will happen as such, but Simon was making noises >> about writing code to treat hash indexes as unlogged automatically, which >> would more or less fix the worst risks. That's not just a special case >> for hash indexes, but any index AM that lacks WAL support, as third-party >> AMs might well do. > > > As someone writing a 3rd-party AM, literally right this moment, do you have > a link to that thread? While I follow this list fairly closely I don't > remember seeing this. I'd love to understand the thoughts around handling > extension-based AMs. >
You are looking for this: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/capphfdsxwzmojm6dx+tjnpyk27kt4o7ri6x_4oswcbyu1rm...@mail.gmail.com Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
