On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 10/29/14 8:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I'm sympathetic to that line of reasoning, but I really think that if >> you want to keep this infrastructure, it needs to be made portable. > > Let me clarify that this was my intention. I have looked at many test > frameworks, many of which are much nicer than what we have, but the > portability and dependency implications for this project would have been > between shocking and outrageous. I settled for what I felt was the > absolute minimum: Perl + IPC::Run. It was only later on that I learned > that 1) subtests don't work in Perl 5.10, and 2) subtests are broken in > Perl 5.12. So we removed the use of subtests and now we are back at the > baseline I started with.
Thanks. At last check, which I think was approximately last week, the tests were running and passing on my machine. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
