On 7/11/14 4:36 AM, Ali Akbar wrote: > But i found some bug in libxml2's code, because we call xmlCopyNode with > 1 as the second parameter, internally xmlCopyNode will call > xmlStaticCopyNode recursively via xmlStaticCopyNodeList. And > xmlStaticCopyNodeList doesn't check the return of xmlStaticCopyNode > whether it's NULL. So if someday the recursion returns NULL (maybe > because of memory exhaustion), it will SEGFAULT. > > Knowing this but in libxml2 code, is this patch is still acceptable?
This problem was fixed in libxml2 2.9.2 (see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708681). -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
